Manuscript Submission and Review Process

Authors must submit their manuscripts via the journal’s online submission platform, prepared in accordance with the journal’s Author Guidelines. All required documents, forms, and supplementary materials must be uploaded in full.

The manuscript is reviewed for relevance to the journal’s scope, compliance with academic writing standards, structural completeness, and basic scientific quality. Manuscripts not meeting the minimum criteria may be returned to authors or rejected at this stage.

The manuscript undergoes similarity detection using plagiarism‑checking software. This step ensures scientific originality and adherence to the journal’s ethical policies in compliance with COPE guidelines.

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent reviewers who are specialists in the subject area. The entire peer‑review process is conducted in a double-blind manner to ensure fairness, impartiality, and confidentiality.

After receiving reviewers’ reports, the editorial team communicates one of the following decisions: acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection. Detailed reviewer comments are provided to help authors improve their work.

If revisions are requested, authors must address all reviewer comments carefully and resubmit the revised version within the specified deadline. A detailed response-to-reviewers document is required.

After the revised version is submitted, the Editor-in-Chief evaluates it—sometimes with the help of reviewers—to ensure that all concerns have been adequately addressed. Upon approval, the manuscript is officially accepted for publication.

Accepted manuscripts undergo scientific editing, language editing, technical layout, and typesetting. Once finalized, the article is published online in the appropriate issue of the journal.